The New York Times on October 5 wrote an article "The 273 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List," where tweets posted by Donald Trump are compiled.
The mere existence of such article is a problem to the reputable news agency as no particular reason was given for its production. Thus, it leaves an open interpretation where their collective stance is against Trump and on the side of Hillary Clinton, as there are only two presidential candidates in the 2016 US elections.
The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics states that:
Seek Truth and Report It
Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticisms or allegations of wrongdoing.
Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
Avoid stereotyping. Journalists should examine the ways their values and experiences may shape their reporting.
Minimize Harm
Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do.
Consider the long-term implications of the extended reach and permanence of publication. Provide updated and more complete information as appropriate.
Balance the public's need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness.
Though there is no particular mention of a stance and no context was given to justify the article, this leaves a thought for character assassination instead, wherein the sole purpose of compiling Donald Trump's tweets are to further exploit his immoral behavior over minority groups and individuals.
Indeed, Donald Trump is a misogynistic political failure. But it is not reasonable enough for the media to slide down to his level. It is not an excuse to be illogical and judge him based on what is coming out from his mouth. Losing focus on reporting political banter and mudslinging will improve public discourse on pressing national issues.